YDS: The Clare Spark Blog

September 29, 2010

Stephen Colbert Doesn’t See Labor

Filed under: Uncategorized — clarelspark @ 7:29 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Woody Guthrie and his famous guitar

On Friday, September 24, celebrity comedian and (on his Comedy Central program) pseudo-conservative Stephen Colbert, famous for not “see[ing] race,” addressed the House Committee on Immigration, obliquely taking on the question of  farm workers. I do not know the temperature in the New York State farm that he visited for one day (or part of one), or how many hours he actually labored there, or what exactly he did, for though he taped it, only a snippet has been shown to his viewers. Opinion was divided regarding the “appropriateness” of his prank (partly because he remained in character), even within the Democratic Party. But Colbert doubtless thinks he has struck a blow for freedom that will make a difference. Pluckily, he has called attention to the problem, as though no one had ever thought about it before.

But on Monday September 27, the temperature in Los Angeles hit 113 degrees, and my thoughts wandered to the everyday conditions that seasonal farm workers in California encounter. In the 1930s and 1940s, labor advocate Carey McWilliams wrote frequently on the subject in such books as Factories in the Field; * Edward R. Murrow even produced a documentary for television on the subject, one so graphic that it temporarily raised the temperature of the do-gooders in the audience. And one of Woody Guthrie’s most touching protest songs, “Deportee” (1948) referred to the facelessness of nameless braceros, killed in a plane crash, along with other passengers. [Yes, I know these figures--McWilliams, Murrow, and Guthrie-- were either communists or fellow travelers, but at least they were consistently raising the issue of worker health and safety.]

The crops are all in and the peaches are rott’ning,
The oranges piled in their creosote dumps;
They’re flying ‘em back to the Mexican border
To pay all their money to wade back again

Goodbye to my Juan, goodbye, Rosalita,
Adios mis amigos, Jesus y Maria;
You won’t have your names when you ride the big airplane,
All they will call you will be “deportees”

My father’s own father, he waded that river,
They took all the money he made in his life;
My brothers and sisters come working the fruit trees,
And they rode the truck till they took down and died.

Some of us are illegal, and some are not wanted,
Our work contract’s out and we have to move on;
Six hundred miles to that Mexican border,
They chase us like outlaws, like rustlers, like thieves.

We died in your hills, we died in your deserts,
We died in your valleys and died on your plains.
We died ‘neath your trees and we died in your bushes,
Both sides of the river, we died just the same.

The sky plane caught fire over Los Gatos Canyon,
A fireball of lightning, and shook all our hills,
Who are all these friends, all scattered like dry leaves?
The radio says, “They are just deportees”

Is this the best way we can grow our big orchards?
Is this the best way we can grow our good fruit?
To fall like dry leaves to rot on my topsoil
And be called by no name except “deportees”?

Words by Woody Guthrie and Music by Martin Hoffman
© 1961 (renewed) by TRO-Ludlow Music, Inc.

     It is obvious that Colbert, like other “liberals” is not concerned with the conditions of labor among immigrants or anyone else. He is a typical social democrat or “liberal” who has co-opted the 19th C. Left but has no real feeling for the hazards and misery of those who bend over all the day in killer heat, who inhale or handle dangerous carcinogens, or live from hand to mouth, or for those other low level workers who must indulge in mind-numbing activities. (And don’t get me started on the joys of child-rearing and housework, an exhausting task that upper-class women farm out to nannies and casual laborers, always other women). What I am saying is that the very nature of work itself goes unexamined among the left-liberals/social democrats, while corrupt labor unions are incorporated as a sign that the Democratic Party loves “the middle class” (the moniker that has replaced the working class). At least in the days of the old Left, the nature of work itself was the issue, not such populist evasions like “Wall Street vs. Main Street” (notwithstanding the omnipresent caricature of the bloated finance capitalist, beloved of commie cartoonists and “proletarian novelists”).

   Seen in this light, Colbert’s gesture was not only “not very funny” as some critics complained, but was at best dilettantish, given the actual life conditions of millions of humans, world wide, but particularly here, the land of opportunity. But Colbert is not alone. Our oppositional culture, such as it is (and I include the “liberal” writers for the mass media), shares in his insensibility and conformity. As for the libertarians and other leaders of the Right, their humanism and sincerity as the charitable alternative to bloated bureaucracies is tested by this issue. If they don’t want socialism (even some variety that has not yet existed), then they should envision alternative policies that more effectively ameliorate the condition of labor– the labor that Stephen Colbert apparently does not think about much. 

*Recently republished by the UC Press (2000) and described thus: “This book was the first broad exposé of the social and environmental damage inflicted by the growth of corporate agriculture in California. Factories in the Field—together with the work of Dorothea Lange, Paul Taylor, and John Steinbeck—dramatizes the misery of the dust bowl migrants hoping to find work in California agriculture. McWilliams starts with the scandals of the Spanish land grant purchases, and continues on to examine the experience of the various ethnic groups that have provided labor for California’s agricultural industry—Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans, Filipinos, Armenians—the strikes, and the efforts to organize labor unions.”

Postcript: I asked my gardener how he had managed with the excessive heat on Monday. He answered that “it is always like this in my country [sic].” Even if natives of Central and South America had evolved with greater tolerance to heat, that evades damage to the back, or the damage wreaked by pesticides.

About these ads

3 Comments »

  1. Thank you for this, Clare, Few, whatever their position, really understand how back breaking such work really is. Just as an example, when Alabama put it’s draconian anti-immigration law into effect – with leaders claiming it would save jobs for legal Alabamans – I thought hard about just how many legal Alabamans would actually do the illegal immigrant work of picking fruit and veg, or wash dishes or peel taters in the backs of restaurants for more than about 10 minutes AND how many of their parents would for actually permit it of their kin. The point being: not many who have strong feelings on the topic really understand it, boots on the ground.

    I do remember one who did know- a genuine subversive in this way: Julia Child (RIP) used to have a show where she went out with shrimpers or into the fields with artichoke or strawberry pickers and such, to find out just how hard it is to obtain food for her/our table (s); and was it ever. Wake up call for her, and for me.

    When I was 17, I got a job in the pineapple canneries in Honolulu. (It’s where I learned to like pineapple. A beaufiul young Hawaiian girl on the canning line gave me a piece. Since there was no way I was going to refuse her, I took it, and ate it, and I’ve loved it ever since.) Anyway, I had fantasized a job in the fields, shirtless, tan, picking pineapple in the sun, surfing in the afternoon. Fortunately, I was unable to figure out how to get such a job – and golly was I glad in the end. As I later discovered, it would have been: head to toe in canvas, hat, mask gloves, boots, 90 degrees, following a machine through the red mud 8 hours or more a day.

    The Colbert stunt does sound pretty silly, but I’m glad attention is brought to the issue somehow.

    Comment by Michael Meric — August 24, 2012 @ 3:20 pm | Reply

    • The larger question I addressed here is the entire problem of how to protect agricultural labor. Should it be through a guest worker program or something else? I am in no way agreeing that looking the other way as illegals enter the country in droves, often to get welfare benefits, is the proper solution.

      Comment by clarespark — August 24, 2012 @ 3:25 pm | Reply

  2. Unfortunately, liberals’ idea of individual rights is “the government should stay out of people’s private lives”, which sounds good until you realize that to them, what this actually means is that nobody really has a private life, nor do they give a damn about people as individuals. To them its all about group identity. Take care of the herd and all will be well. If someone strays too far from the herd, just shepherd them back in. Sort of like the damage control they are trying to do now over Colbert’s antics in Congress, something that was certainly not anticipated-or perhaps it was the negative reaction that wasn’t expected.

    Colbert and Stewart are supposedly going to headline some kind of rally soon. That should be a real hoot. It will probably be about as effective for Democrats as the Coffee Party.

    Comment by Patrick Kelley — October 3, 2010 @ 11:57 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,273 other followers

%d bloggers like this: