The Clare Spark Blog

February 2, 2011

“…the legitimate aspirations of the ___ people”

Filed under: Uncategorized — clarelspark @ 7:07 pm
Tags: , , ,

William Jennings Bryan

[This was originally written during the Egyptian revolt that displaced Mubarak, but remains relevant, especially if we apply it to the Democratic Party or OWS.]

Recall that PLO spokesmen constantly use the phrase “the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people”? This constantly reiterated trope is populist propaganda, pure and simple. We hear it today in cable news and elsewhere, except that the word Palestinian has been replaced by “the Egyptian people.” This is populist talk, and populism is a buzz word that is applied by propagandists of both parties seeking to implant the notion that there is an oppressor whose foot is on the neck of the population at large: it could be “Wall Street” or “The Northeastern establishment” or “experts” or “the Washington DC Beltway.” (See The oppressor monopolizes force and has not been elected by the [protesting] people, all of whom are supposed to share the same life goals and interests. And who confers legitimacy? Or is legitimacy irrelevant because populists implicity believe in spirits–vox populi, vox dei?

Such loose talk, resistant to precise common sense analysis, makes it easy to conflate competing factions with incompatible objectives and divergent views of the source of evil. In the U.S. there was a definable populist movement that emerged forcefully in the latter quarter of the nineteenth century. They were small producers, small farmers, and artisans displaced by the growth of big business, and otherwise threatened by railroads and banks. As debtors, they wanted to defend their interests against “monopolies” and to get off the gold standard so that the government could print easy money. (For a defense of this movement, see Michael Kazin’s biography of William Jennings Bryan, a good job of history writing, except that he ignores the antisemitism that was an intrinsic part of the populist movement, and also denies that Bryan was afflicted with it (in an email to me), notwithstanding the rhetoric of his famous Cross of Gold speech. Richard Hofstadter noted the pervasive antisemitism in his ”The Age of Reform” and was heavily criticized for it by New Left historians beginning with Michael Rogin in his book on McCarthyism.)

This blog is primarily a plea for readers to demand that their news gatherers specify the factions in the current Egyptian agitation and describe their interests and objectives. Is this primarily a youth revolt? If so, do these supposedly secular, social-media loving youth share the widespread reactionary Arab resentment of the U.S. and Israel? Do they want to purge the schools of antisemitic propaganda, much of it based on the heavily distributed Protocols of the Elders of Zion? Just asking.


  1. […] The WSJ  is apparently unaware that the populist movement was originally for “the people” (mostly small producers, who may inhabit the entire spectrum of socioeconomic opinion; see […]

    Pingback by Whither the white working class? | YDS: The Clare Spark Blog — December 17, 2015 @ 8:29 pm | Reply

  2. […] But even worse, populist politics pervade popular culture, and are promiscuous in their antagonism toward “elites”. In its original form, populism was heavily antisemitic (i.e., bankers, like “Wall Street” were generically a Jewish cabal with ambitions to control the world), a fact brushed out by its New Left defenders. (See […]

    Pingback by LABOR DAY 2014 | YDS: The Clare Spark Blog — August 29, 2014 @ 8:21 pm | Reply

  3. well said. Uprisings like this are the movement of an amorphous mass. It would indeed help were the media to sort out the factions. Juan Cole’s blog, Informed Comment, does so in today’s entry(although I suspect you are not a fan of his). These moments of disorder provide the occasion for the best organized and most commited to attain power. The military establishment, the Muslim Brotherhood, and some combination of opposition groups are all candidates. The power struggle is yet to come. It was at moments like this that the Bolsheviks , Italian fascism, Nazism, Fidel Castro’s 26 of July movement, and the clerical faction of Khomeini emerged on top. If the Egyption winner is one dependent upon public support, it will have a hard time maintaining the treaty with Israel. Hatred of Israel and, indeed, anti-semitism are wide-spread and have deep roots not only in Egypt but throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds.

    Comment by david gansel — February 2, 2011 @ 7:53 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: