The Clare Spark Blog

October 14, 2012


  1. Because Marx’s “scientific” prediction — that the workers would revolt in the most advanced capitalist countries — was falsified by history, Orwell’s Inner Party (Djilas’ New Class, Voslenskii’s Nomenlatura, etc.) accuses workers of “false consciousness” to suggest that Fabian intellectuals know the interests of the working class better than the proles themselves. Because workers rejected the leadership of this “vanguard,” it has latched onto racial, sexual, etc. minorities, mute animals, or the earth itself as their constituencies.

    Comment by Mark LaRochelle — June 12, 2014 @ 7:41 pm | Reply

    • Yes, but the social democrats were the originators of this victimology. The communists went along with them as part of the Popular Front against Republicans/laissez-faire capitalism. The New Left also played a role, as back-to-nature-lovers and primitivists.

      Comment by clarelspark — June 12, 2014 @ 7:44 pm | Reply

  2. I do hope to find my old articles on the psychology of alienation, reification as a prime engine driving de-humanization, Marx’ own abnormal psych. primer contained in the ignored “1844 Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts,” and my own small contribution of “intrapsychic imperialism,” where the subjective inner fantasy world becomes commoditized and spatialized. [Katz, G.M.; (c)1979].
    Fun for the whole family! Doc

    Comment by gk68 — June 12, 2014 @ 1:12 pm | Reply

  3. Reblogged this on Winning the War against Islamic Fascism and commented:
    Dr. Spark says it all!>>>>again!

    Comment by gk68 — June 12, 2014 @ 2:00 am | Reply

  4. *Note: ‘ railing against the industrializing bourgeoisie that had once raised the status of all women….’ “all” but the hundreds of millions of mutilated, disfigured, dismembered girls/women of the Islamist world. Cultural difference, I suppose.

    Comment by gk68 — June 12, 2014 @ 1:58 am | Reply

  5. […] railing against the industrializing bourgeoisie that had once raised the status of all women. (See, partly about Judith Butler, their […]

    Pingback by Gendered wage inequality: an overview | YDS: The Clare Spark Blog — April 10, 2014 @ 8:24 pm | Reply

  6. […] Multiculturalism, the dominant ideology in progressive reformism, its purported “inclusiveness” operates on the same racialist assumptions as the more overtly völkisch Hitler approach. If you read the multiculturalists, you will see that “there is no truth,” nor any possibility for communication between races or ethnicities, for all knowledge is “local.” Even hip postmodernists hold to this wacky “historicist” viewpoint and warn us about “the pastness of the past,” the terra incognita where none dares venture.  (See […]

    Pingback by The “demographic change” explanation is racist « YDS: The Clare Spark Blog — November 8, 2012 @ 6:17 pm | Reply

  7. I am no fan of marxist-leninists, but what is the evidence that they are anti-semitic??

    Comment by btraven — October 15, 2012 @ 6:56 pm | Reply

    • Even if you dismiss anti-Zionism as not being associated with antisemitism, there is the influence of J. A. Hobson’s theory of the International Jew that was such a powerful influence on Lenin. In general, the Leninists identify “finance capital” as the primary enemy of the people, and “the money power” has ever been the target of populists of every stripe. But for a glossary of antisemitism in all its sources and variants, I recommend this attempt of mine to organize the sources of Jew-hatred:

      Comment by clarespark — October 15, 2012 @ 7:05 pm | Reply

      • @btraven: In 1856, Marx wrote a book called The Jewish Question, which Richard Wurmbrand discussed in his book Marx and Satan. From my entry on excerpts from Chapter 3 of Wurmbrand’s work are his citations from Marx. This is the quote from The Jewish Question:

        ‘We know that behind every tyrant stands a Jew, as a Jesuit stands behind every Pope. As the army of the Jesuits kills every free thought, so the desire of the oppressed would have chances of success, the usefulness of wars incited by capitalists would cease, if it were not for the Jews who steal the treasures of mankind. It is no wonder that 1856 years ago Jesus chased the usurers from the Jerusalem temple …’

        Yet, Marx (raised as a Lutheran), also wrote in favour of Jews in other works. In The Capital, Volume I, under the heading ‘The Capitalist Character of Manufacture’ he wrote, ‘In the front of the chosen people it was written that they are the property of Jehovah.’

        That said, Marx didn’t have much time for anyone outside of his immediate circle, it seems. He railed against fellow Europeans, the Chinese and blacks. Wurmbrand observed, citing Marx:

        ‘”Germans, Chinese, and Jews have to be compared with peddlers and small merchants.” He called the Russians “cabbage-eaters.” The Slavic peoples were “ethnic trash.” He expressed his hatred of many nations, but never his love.

        ‘Marx wrote in his new year’s roundup of 1848 about “the Slavic riffraff,” which included Russians, Czechs, and Croats. These “retrograde” races had nothing left for them by fate except “the immediate task of perishing in the revolutionary world storm.”

        ‘Marx identified black people with “idiots” and constantly used the offensive term “n—–” in private correspondence …’

        More here: and

        Marx was not the ideological cover page ‘man of the year’ or centrefold many of us, myself included, thought he was.

        Comment by churchmouse — October 15, 2012 @ 10:42 pm

    • Could it be that they killed so many?

      Comment by hrwolfe — March 3, 2016 @ 3:05 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: