While Ted Cruz was calling Republicans to arms to overturn Obamacare, I was watching the movie version of Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), in its uncut version. (Ben Urwand insists that Universal pictures caved to German pressure to remove certain incendiary scenes that impugned the older generation for mindless nationalism that slaughtered their young soldiers. I watched the uncut version that attacked the upper class older generation for murdering their unprepared lower class young men, through glorifying sacrifice for the Fatherland, teaching irrelevant subjects in schools, and for inadequate training, food, leadership, hygiene, and medical care while in combat.)
The original uncut movie reminded me of the pacifism that moved the formation of Pacifica Radio immediately after WW2. Such Remarque-like antiwar sentiments lack an analysis of the lead up to wars, but imagine an undifferentiated class of enlisted men, badly led by undifferentiated old and middle-aged men. Indeed, Remarque himself was born into a Catholic home (his father was a bookbinder, not a politicized worker), then after his recovery from wounds in the war, went on to write numerous novels after his autobiographical first novel (that of course was banned and burned by the (relatively young) Nazis in power. His brazen book was riotously protested before the Nazis were put in power by…old men: the monarchists and conservative nationalists of Germany who hoped to control Hitler and his hotheads in order to destroy communism and the independent working class movement that opposed the Nazis.
Remarque, a handsome fellow, went on to a successful career as an author and affairs with glamorous movie stars. In trying to place him as if he existed later in the 20th century, I would have to locate him in the counter-culture, not in any political faction. In the 1960s, boys like him might have been draft dodgers or protesters against the Viet Nam conflict. But the more politicized would have had a more sophisticated analysis of WW1. For instance, they might have looked to rival imperialisms, or to the failure of the Socialist Parties to oppose the war in 1914, voting for war credits in Germany. Or if more attuned to the errors of diplomats, they might have come to agree with Niall Ferguson’s The Pity of War.
By the time Remarque wrote his novel, disillusion with the idea of progress pervaded what we now call the Jazz Age. Hemingway had written two antiwar novels (The Sun Also Rises about an aimless generation), then A Farewell to Arms (more overtly antiwar and vaguely autobiographical). I have found one quote where Remarque prefigured the anti-technology sentiments of the counter culture, arguing for a vague humanism and faith in humanity; he was no nihilist.
The conflict du jour is over whether or not Ted Cruz is a hothead and ambitious for personal power. I am reminded of a line from the much lauded House of Cards remake, offered by Netflix to its subscribers. This time, a ruthless Southern Democrat, “Francis Underwood” (played by Kevin Spacey), explains to the audience that he isn’t in it for the money but for “power”. Such is the charge now leveled at Ted Cruz by an older generation that hews to a more bipartisan approach to the management of social policy.
We know much more about this political war than Remarque knew about his war as an eighteen year old Catholic boy. Given what I have studied about the moderate men—i.e, the older generation in charge today, it is difficult not to call them out for utopianism. (See https://clarespark.com/2010/11/06/moderate-men-falling-down/.)
The Clare Spark Blog 
Your comments about utopianism lead me to seek comment on your position about the other side of that argument and, in the supposed age of dedication to equality, your focus on old men. Your view of the juxtaposition of each side in both cases would also be revealing.
Comment by Howard Jones — September 26, 2013 @ 1:00 pm |
Anyone can be a utopian in any stage of life. The historian Frank E. Manuel noted that utopianism is part of the human personality. I have no quarrel with old men as such. It is when they dispose of youth in order to satisfy their own unmet needs that it becomes necessary to stand with youth. Youth may be half-baked and foolish too, but this blog was directed to the fight against Obamacare, which is a life and death matter to all people, old and young alike. There will be death panels and there are not enough doctors. There is also a widespread ignorance among the public about hygiene and health in general. All of these problems require attention. This is a scholar blog, and I try not to impose my own opinions on the issues of the day. Won’t say more than that, except to recommend that you read my essay on the moderate men, linked within the blog. As for equality, equality of condition is utopian, while equality of opportunity is not.
Comment by clarelspark — September 26, 2013 @ 2:26 pm |